Targeted Killing and Drone Warfare

Authored by: Laurie Calhoun

Routledge Handbook of Critical Terrorism Studies

Print publication date:  April  2016
Online publication date:  April  2016

Print ISBN: 9780415743761
eBook ISBN: 9781315813462
Adobe ISBN: 9781317801627

10.4324/9781315813462.ch18

 Download Chapter

 

Abstract

The controversy surrounding the use of unmanned combat aerial vehicles (UCAVs), or lethal drones, stems in large part from fundamental disagreements over the very nature of remote-control killing, which is new in human history. Never before was it possible for soldiers to fight wars without themselves facing the prospect of personal sacrifice. Those who believe that remote-control killing is a perfectly legitimate act of war and an important counterterrorism tactic praise the practice for preserving innocent life and minimizing collateral damage, while sparing allied soldiers the risk of physical harm. The most vocal advocates of drone warfare have maintained that targeted killing is the best – or even the only – available means for fighting the number one enemy in the twenty-first century: shadowy and fluid terrorist groups such as al Qaeda, Al-Shabaab, and ISIS (Porter 2010; Bowden 2013; Byman 2013).

 Cite
Search for more...
Back to top

Use of cookies on this website

We are using cookies to provide statistics that help us give you the best experience of our site. You can find out more in our Privacy Policy. By continuing to use the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.