The Comparative Method

Theoretical issues

Authored by: Mark Hale

The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics

Print publication date:  June  2014
Online publication date:  March  2015

Print ISBN: 9780415527897
eBook ISBN: 9781315794013
Adobe ISBN: 9781317743248

10.4324/9781315794013.ch5

 Download Chapter

 

Abstract

I will use the phrase ‘the Comparative Method’ (or ‘the Method’) in this chapter to refer to a fairly well-defined process of scientific hypothesis formation which leads to the reconstruction of ancestral linguistic objects, given linguistic data from a set of (sub)grouped, related ‘daughter’ languages. Like all serious scientific pursuits, the implementation of the procedure requires the careful consideration of a variety of types of evidence (in this case, directionality limitations on change events, triviality indices of change events, probability of borrowing, chance, and iconic similarities, etc.). The Method allows for (indeed, strictly speaking demands) the reconstruction of ‘intermediate’ proto-language forms (i.e., those of the ancestor of any subgroup) as well as the (ultimate) proto-language forms themselves. Since the Method produces proto-forms (including the ‘intermediate’ proto-forms of subgroups), and daughter forms are its input, it provides initial, intermediate and termination data points for (some of) the forms of the languages under investigation. It is therefore possible on the basis of the reconstructed material to construct a historical grammar of the languages, indeed, the decision about what to reconstruct is simultaneously an implicit claim as to the events which comprise that historical grammar.

 Cite
Search for more...
Back to top

Use of cookies on this website

We are using cookies to provide statistics that help us give you the best experience of our site. You can find out more in our Privacy Policy. By continuing to use the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.