A Bird’s-Eye View of the “Pieces” vs. “Coherence” Controversy (from the “Pieces” side of the Fence)

Authored by: Andrea A. diSessa

International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change

Print publication date:  June  2013
Online publication date:  July  2013

Print ISBN: 9780415898829
eBook ISBN: 9780203154472
Adobe ISBN: 9781136578212

10.4324/9780203154472.ch2

 Download Chapter

 

Abstract

The central principle of conceptual change research is the constructivist idea that “old” ideas constrain learning. In classroom-relevant study, conceptual change research has laid blame for difficulties at the feet of “entrenched naïve ideas.” In physics, naïve ideas said to be like the medieval impetus theory of motion must give way to counterintuitive Newtonian ideas (McCloskey, 1983). Similarly, developmental studies seek to find the great intellectual accomplishments of childhood in dramatic revisions to the way domains are construed. Childhood biology has been claimed to be psychological (Carey, 1985) or “vitalistic” (Inagaki & Hatano, 2002), in stark contrast to adult or scientific ideas about living things.

 Cite
Search for more...
Back to top

Use of cookies on this website

We are using cookies to provide statistics that help us give you the best experience of our site. You can find out more in our Privacy Policy. By continuing to use the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.