School Consultation and Response to Intervention

Convergence, Divergence, and Future Directions for Research and Practice

Authored by: Amy L. Reschly , Daniel J. Reschly

Handbook of Research in School Consultation

Print publication date:  April  2014
Online publication date:  April  2014

Print ISBN: 9780415501200
eBook ISBN: 9780203133170
Adobe ISBN: 9781136478444

10.4324/9780203133170.ch20

 Download Chapter

 

Abstract

The purpose of response to intervention (RTI) in educational settings is to improve achievement and behavior and to overcome current achievement gaps. Three gaps are prominent in policy discussions and federal legislation: (a) U.S. student performance is significantly lower compared to student performance in other economically advanced nations (Kirsh, Braun, Yamamoto, & Sum, 2007; Learning for Tomorrow’s World, 2003; Mullis, Martin, Gonzalez, & Chrostowski, 2003; Nation at Risk, 1983); (b) students within the United States with high rates of poverty score significantly lower on various achievement measures than more economically advantaged students (Kirsh et al., 2007); and (c) groups within the United States that vary by race/ethnicity show large variations in achievement, explained in large part by the association with poverty (Barton & Coley, 2008, 2010; Nation’s Report Card Mathematics, 2011; Nation’s Report Card Reading, 2011). Improving current student performance overall and overcoming gaps are addressed with RTI.

 Cite
Search for more...
Back to top

Use of cookies on this website

We are using cookies to provide statistics that help us give you the best experience of our site. You can find out more in our Privacy Policy. By continuing to use the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.