Landscape and non-representational theories

Authored by: Emma Waterton

The Routledge Companion to Landscape Studies

Print publication date:  December  2012
Online publication date:  February  2013

Print ISBN: 9780415684606
eBook ISBN: 9780203096925
Adobe ISBN: 9781136220609

10.4324/9780203096925.ch5

 Download Chapter

 

Abstract

Landscape research has recently seen a burgeoning of interest around notions of ‘affect’, ‘emotion’, ‘embodiment’, ‘performance’ and ‘practice’. Although these notions can be parcelled together in a variety of ways, in this chapter I want to situate them within the still developing range of work dealing with what has come to be termed non-representational theory. As a style of thinking, non-representational theory emerged in the mid-1990s. Though originally coined by Nigel Thrift, it is today associated with Ben Anderson, John-David Dewsbury, Paul Harrison, Hayden Lorimer, Derek McComack, Mitch Rose and John Wylie, all of whom, like Thrift, are geographers based in the UK. The term ‘theory’ is perhaps a little disingenuous here as it implies something in the singular; non-representational theories may be more useful a term (see Anderson 2009), as it denotes something of a catchall rather than a strict or prescriptive theoretical framework. With this in mind, Hayden Lorimer (2005: 83) has proposed the phrase ‘more-than-representational’, which seems to adequately sum up attempts ‘ … to cope with our self-evidently more-than-human, more-than-textual, multisensual worlds’.

 Cite
Search for more...
Back to top

Use of cookies on this website

We are using cookies to provide statistics that help us give you the best experience of our site. You can find out more in our Privacy Policy. By continuing to use the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.